“I’m Charlie Walker (2022).” It is the critique of this critic that if the movie does not resonate with someone, it would be frustrating to watch it if they were able to visualize a version I could have. I am Charlie Walker a good reviewer of that idea. The new film from director Patrick Gilles aspires to discover its many different styles, from Spike Lee-esque didactic fiction to honoring Blaxploitation and brings together talented actors to see that idea.
Read
I’m Charlie Walker (2022): Movie Review
But, in reality, none of this exceeds the level of flexibility and focuses on something like a TV movie drama. Ways for a better, more interesting movie are always on the lookout, but I, Charlie Walker, never go anywhere, I am very confident with the text is just a few minutes away from reaching its full potential.
As one might guess from the title, the movie follows Charlie Walker (Mike Colter), a Black truck driver in the early ’70s in a San Francisco landscape that he apparently does not want there. After entering the business, he finds himself in a position of success in 1971, when two Standard Oil tanks collided in San Francisco Bay and spilled hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil.
The cleaning task is so great that, to the dismay of racists, Charlie owns his own beach – which, fortunately, ends up being a source of pollution. Knowing the establishment is unlikely to allow him to come out on top, the cunning protagonist motivates him not only to win his competition but to put him in the best position to inevitably face the boss in charge, Mr. Bennett (Dylan Baker).
If anything explains Me ‘s Charlie Walker, it’s high, and this should not be written off as critical. Gilles’ movie (very) has a clear interest in exploring racism and the amount of interaction Charlie has that can quickly say about the color of his skin can be counted on one hand.
The film opens by calling SF’s reputation as a left-wing extremist and, as Charlie’s job is to remove the unpleasant black thing from the surface of the white ocean (something he shows is much better than anyone), something could happen. a sharp mockery here. The comeo from filmmaker and singer Riley, who directed the infinite art Sorry to Bother You, also blinked. But the script is so vague that dealing with it at that level can be bad.
Since there is no compelling message to chew on, the audience will want to conspire again and here, I am Charlie Walker suffering from a slight lack. The story as it is told is less interesting than what the movie thinks. Charlie thinks that one step ahead is set as high intelligence and there is nothing about the structure that the audience will not see as obvious.
The characters do not develop in the past imaginary ideas, from hippies to dishonest businessmen and racist bullies (complete by dragging South Africans dangerous despite being obviously NorCal locals), leaving them with no growing audience to hold on to. The decision to keep telling the viewer what is happening with voiceover, a source of TV documentary comparisons, gives them little reason to pay attention to the scenes themselves.
The only real saving grace is for the characters, who end up being pigs in a test of how hard it is to overcome raw foods. I’m Charlie Walker who covers a lot of faces that viewers will remember they loved elsewhere: apart from Luke Cage’s Colter and The Good Wife’s Baker, Carl Lumbly later became the best part of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, and Monica Barbaro hopefully he should be greatly enlarged. and better things now as Top Gun: Maverick is finally in the theater.
However, no matter how often these players appear, they are all used less, they are asked to hold one note longer than it is believed or involved. Even if everyone glances in the blink of an eye, as good actors are accustomed to doing, times will probably never be seen, the film has long convinced its viewers to stop.
Related – Rounding (2022): Horror Movie Review
